- With or install Professional accessories : None
- Whether with metal toe cap: No
- Whether waterproof: No
- Upper fixing method: stitching
- Upper coverage: Not above ankle
- High-concerned chemical: None
- Material: POLYESTER
- Upper Height: low
- Sports Type: Lunlar
- Insole Material: PVC
- Applicable Place: Concrete Floor
- Level Of Practice: Professional
- Fit: True to Size
- For Distance: 10km
- Shoe Width: Medium(B,M)
- Feature: Breathable,Balance,Height Increasing,Waterproof,Reflective
- Upper Material: Leather
- Outsole Material: PVC
- Gender: Men
- Brand Name: Xtep
- Origin: Mainland China
- CN: Fujian
- Department Name: Adult
- Closure Type: Lace-Up
- Athletic Shoe Type: Running Shoes
XTEP PROFESSIONAL SPORTS FASHION BRAND
Focuses on the field of running and is committed to the comfort and health of the vast runner’s movement. develop more comfortable running shoes for professional runners.
As the Xtep Official Store, we are 100% original and authentic.
Xtep engages mainly in sports footwear, apparel and accessories. Established since 2001, we have been a leading professional sports brand with an extensive distribution network of over 6,000 stores covering 31 provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities across the PRC and overseas.
Product number:874119110023
Product features:Rebound Support Professional Cushioning Shock Absorption Durability






















Very good running shoe for the price, slightly hard at first but then they become a bit softer and more responsive.
I recommend them if you land on your heel or midfoot, NOT recommended if you land on your toes, there's little cushioning there.
I never thought of buying Chinese running shoes in my daily life, but...
I saw that the xtep.2000km 5.0 has just been released, so I'm offering a discount.
They keep giving out coupons everywhere, it's just too much.
It was 70,000 won, so I bought it because it was cheap.
Maybe it's because my expectations were low, but I was a bit surprised to be honest.
The initial feeling when wearing it is similar to that of the Siren S4.
The overall cushioning in the forefoot seems slightly more substantial, giving a slightly less firm feel compared to the EN model.
I've been wearing Puma Dina 2 every day these days. I'm trying to roll with Magmax and Magni3. I'll have to try rolling with this one without the Dina2. It feels like it's a shoe that fits a size 4 or 5.
You'll have to try it to know... I just hope there's no damage.
I wonder if the newly released pro version is suitable for LSD... 5.0 seems like it might cause fatigue if you exceed 15 keys.
Anyway, I can't really ignore the fact that Chinese brands have improved in terms of cost performance.
If the midsole cushioning could be improved a bit, it would be really great under the carbon fiber.
I feel like I'm going to chew up the Major Brand product.
I wear size 290 because I have wide feet, except for the wide versions of all brands.
I ordered size 45, and it seems to fit perfectly in terms of length, width, and instep.
It definitely feels like an upgrade from 3.0.
First of all, it's nice that the toe box has become a bit wider, and the shoelaces have been changed to allow for more flexibility.
The elasticity seems a bit stronger, and the stability is also better.
First of all, I ran 5km twice, so I will post an additional review later.
3.0 is at a point where its durability has been somewhat verified.
5.0 seems to be the best value-for-money running shoe.
Highly recommended for those who only jog lightly for about 5 to 10 km.
P.S. The store promptly responded to my request to change the color of the sneakers. Excellent service!
The ball has been slightly widened and the length has been slightly reduced.
It's still light and good.
Very good quality and finish, and excellent cushioning.
The upper part is very light and breathable, the thin and soft tongue does not cause any discomfort, and it's easy to find the right position for the foot.
It's not a shoe for those who like to "sink" their foot inside, but it has a substantial foam that supports the foot well and provides a nice push when taking off.
The previous model, after almost 400 km, had not lost any cushioning and the midsole also remained virtually unchanged visually. Compared to the 2.0, as I had already noticed from the photos, there is more foam underneath: the drop remains the same, but the stack height is greater, so there is also more material in the forefoot.